Typing pattern detection

Spot Answer Timing That Does Not Look Like Live Work.

InterviewWatch analyzes timing metadata, not keystroke content. It can flag unusually uniform typing rhythm, injected input patterns, long reading pauses followed by fluent answer bursts, and timing that lines up with AI tool or remote-control signals.

Uniform rhythmReview
Pause to burstReview
Keystroke contentNever captured
Remote input contextHigh
Timing signals

Real work has rhythm. Injected or copied answers often do not.

Typing pattern detection is useful when combined with other evidence. A fast typist is not a fraud signal by itself. A low-variance answer burst after AI activity and a focus change is stronger context.

Uniform keystrokes

Low variation across inter-key timing can indicate programmatic or remote-injected input.

Answer latency

Long pause followed by a polished burst can match reading or transcribing an outside answer.

Context first

Typing signals are scored alongside focus changes, clipboard events, AI tools, and remote-control tools.

Timeline

Timing becomes useful when events line up.

Question askedCandidate pauses for an extended period.
Context
AI tool signalAI assistant activity detected during the pause.
High
Answer burstLong low-variance input sequence appears.
Review