Interviews need evidence, not exam theater.
Often built around camera watching, screen recording, room scans, eye tracking, and exam lock-down assumptions.
Built around hiring workflows, consent-first live integrity metadata, human review, and tamper-evident reports.
Broad video or screen capture can create privacy concerns and still miss hidden or off-screen assistance.
Detects process, window, device, clipboard, remote-control, and timing signals without screen/audio/video recording.
Assumes one rigid environment with strict lock-down.
Supports role-specific context: open-book, closed-book, live coding, recruiter screen, or manager round.
From watching people to monitoring the interview environment.
Choose proctoring when
You are running standardized tests, exams, or lock-down assessments where broad monitoring is expected and legally reviewed.
Choose InterviewWatch when
You need interview-specific AI assistance detection, proxy detection, report evidence, and a privacy model suitable for hiring conversations.
Choose both carefully when
Your process includes formal assessments plus live interviews. Keep candidate notices clear and avoid duplicative or excessive monitoring.
For a deeper look at why the exam-proctoring model doesn't transfer to live, human-led interviews, read why async proctoring isn't enough for live interviews.
Use the model that matches hiring.
InterviewWatch is designed for consent-first interview integrity, not generic exam surveillance.
Compare optionsPrivacy policy